Tag Archives: security

Which security plan? None of the above.

The Washington Post has a new arts blog, to which I contribute from time to time. This past week, I floated the idea that perhaps it’s not worth spending millions of dollars, and diminishing the beauty of the Jefferson Memorial just to create a car-bomb safety perimeter. I don’t think it’s a radical idea. And I’m quite certain I’m a minority of one, at least in this town.


Leave a comment

Filed under Architecture, Security, urban design

Embassy Design, continued

What's wrong with this picture? It's a U.S. embassy located in an actual city.The Post gave me considerable space in Sunday’s paper to look at a new report issued by the American Institute of Architects. The document is a nuts-and-bolts thing, incremental in its recommendations and it hardly glances at the real problem–crippling security dictates–that may make it impossible to build inspiring embassy architecture again. But it proves that there’s momentum to acknowledge the ugly embassies we’ve built and their impact on our public diplomacy agenda. Many architects believe that a workable compromise between security and aesthetics can be achieved through innovative and inspired design. I hope so. The AIA recommends that the office responsible for designing embassy facilities borrow from the GSA, and adopt a “design excellence” program. Perhaps that will help, though design excellence is a great way to ensure you get B-plus structures. It rarely if ever produces A-plus buildings.

But I think without a serious conversation about security, about the degree of risk we must accept, and about the nature of a diplomatic work–perhaps it is fundamentally dangerous and we must simply accept that–we will never build great embassies again. And if we can’t build great ones, then we should at least stop building bad ones. And reinvent diplomacy without embassies. A sad conclusion, and I hope we never get there.

1 Comment

Filed under Architecture

Less is more

Security madness is destroying Washington, warping our democratic republic and making us into Man, the Beast who Cowers. Security–a compromise between freedom and danger–is too important to be left to bureaucrats or specialists, which is why I argue, here, that the best response to the tragic and idiotic act of hate at the Holocaust Museum on June 10 is to do nothing. At least, nothing architecturally. Unfortunately, the comments section after my piece has been taken over by the usual suspects.

1 Comment

Filed under Architecture, Museums