Tag Archives: Opera News

The Met Relents

Reaction was obviously swift, furious and focused, and now the Metropolitan Opera has sent word that Opera News will indeed continue to review new Met productions. An emailed statement came from Lee Abrahamian:

May 22, 2012

Opera News Will Continue to Review Metropolitan Opera Productions

In view of the outpouring of reaction from opera fans about the recent decision to discontinue Met performance reviews in Opera News, the Met has decided to reverse this new editorial policy. From their postings on the internet, it is abundantly clear that opera fans would miss reading reviews about the Met in Opera News. Ultimately, the Met is here to serve the opera-loving public and has changed its decision because of the passionate response of the fans.

The Met and the Met Opera Guild, the publisher of Opera News, have been in discussions about the role of the Guild and how its programs and activities can best fulfill its mission of supporting the Metropolitan Opera. These discussions have included the role of reviews in Opera News, and whether they served that mission.  While the Met believed it did not make sense for a house organ that is published by the Guild and financed by the Met to continue to review Met productions, it has become clear that the reviews generate tremendous excitement and interest and will continue to have a place in Opera News.

That’s good news. But something  more is needed. Peter Gelb needs to make a personal, affirmative statement that he endorses the magazine’s editorial freedom. This isn’t about demanding a groveling apology. It’s about the basic dynamics of censorship.

Censorship works through fear, and it instills fear asymmetrically. The censor doesn’t need to read every word, monitor every statement, or enforce a long list of directives. Quite the opposite. The censor merely needs to make writers, editors and publishers nervous. The more vague the censor is about what is and isn’t allowed, the more power he or she has to enforce control over expression.

I’ve spent a lot of time in countries where freedom of the press is nonexistent. Journalists in authoritarian countries speak of “red lines,” invisible, vague, but powerful gray zones that keep expression constrained. They talk about the red lines as if they’re tangible, but also admit that no one knows exactly where they lie. And that’s the point.

A threat to free speech is never a single, isolated act. It casts a pall, and the people threatened carry that sense of fear with them, self-censoring.

Opera News, over the years, has grown into a remarkably independent publication, and it deserves great credit for defining its mission not only as a voice for the Metropolitan Opera, but as a voice for opera in America and beyond. It performs a valuable service for opera lovers, many of whom will never buy a ticket or attend a performance at the Metropolitan Opera. This rather idiotic (and failed) effort to limit its editorial freedom can lead to two possible futures for the magazine. If Gelb doesn’t affirm the magazine’s freedom from in-house editorial control, Opera News will go forward under a cloud. If Gelb can be coaxed into a genuine statement in support of the magazine’s independence, it will emerge stronger, and will be well positioned to continue its admirable mission of service not just to the Met, but to opera everywhere.


Filed under Culture, Music, Opera

The Met censors…and loses

The Metropolitan Opera has decided not to allow Opera News, published by the Metropolitan Opera Guild, to review any more Met performances. Unhappy with occasional negative (and sometimes quite pointed) reviews, the Met’s general manager Peter Gelb pulled the plug on a tradition dating back to the 1970s. From now on, the Met’s own publication, and the classical music magazine with the largest circulation in the United States, will say nothing negative about the Met. The New York Times reports:

“As of the June 2012 issue, Opera News is not reviewing Metropolitan Opera productions,” F. Paul Driscoll, the magazine’s editor in chief, said in a terse telephone interview. He declined to elaborate but acknowledged that no other opera company had been banished from its pages.

The decision makes another fine artistic institution look simply corporate, more concerned with message and brand control than the free play of art and creativity. The Met loses the input of critics with long institutional knowledge, disappears from a section of the magazine that is lively and well read, and demonstrates to its loyal fan base that it is a nervous, prickly, bureaucratic organization.

Good criticism is an endangered species in American journalism. It has all but disappeared from most American newspapers, and is now yet more circumscribed within the pages of the last vigorous classical music publication in the country.

It’s easy for critics, like me, to become tribal and protective about criticism, without explaining why it matters. One reason it matters is that, when done well, it provides a template for how to listen and remember. The latter, remembering, is key. Criticism isn’t just part of the public memory of a musical performance, it is a demonstration of how to process and analyze a complicated aesthetic experience, what to take note of, and how to organize those memories into something that may stay with you long after the performance. Often, I believe the greatest danger art faces in our busy, chaotic, jangling world is that most people feel that the experience is ephemeral. The curtain comes down, they head to the subway and by the next morning, they legitimately wonder: What do I remember? What stays with me? Criticism, done well, doesn’t just document how one writer remembers a performance, it offers guidance in the kind of thinking and observation that helps everyone remember.

It is about making sure that art isn’t forgettable, in all senses of the word. The Met, as one the most important old-guard artistic institutions in the country, would be better served by actively supporting criticism, not limiting it.

UPDATE: The Met Relents


Filed under Culture, Music, Opera

Where do we find the time for opera?

Opera News editor Brian Kellow approached me a few months ago with that question, which inspired a short riff in the April issue.  Here’s a sample:

What is the elevator pitch for Wagner’s Parsifal? Is there any opera today that could survive the rigorous condensation of modern life? Opera, it seems, requires a slower world. It hides vast amounts of time in its form — not just the duration of the music but the astonishing hours of preparation, the rehearsals and the private study (years, decades, whole lives) upon which every scintilla of music is predicated. When the public balks at the high price of tickets, we often explain the problem in terms of money — the millions of dollars it may cost to put a production onstage. Even more impressive, though impossible to quantify, is the sheer accumulation of time — and history — in every finished work.

And here’s a link to the rest of the essay.

1 Comment

Filed under Culture, Feuilleton, Music, Opera

Debating Arts Education

The Seattle Opera website has taken up discussion of an Opera News article I wrote about opera education. They take issue with my arguments, and they take issue in smart, reasoned and interesting ways. Here’s a link.

Leave a comment

Filed under Culture, Music, Opera

Where does the hate come from?

Sorry folks, if you’re visiting to find out more about the Obama as Joker poster, this is the right website but the wrong post. This post is for the opera crowd, who are busy bees on the internet bulletin board circuit. That’s the subject of a short essay I wrote for the September issue of Opera News.  Here’s the opening:

If you want to comprehend the dismal spectrum of humanity, compare the user comments on two websites. At Liveleak.com, a portal that posts violent police and war videos, the public forum is filled with racist rants and callous celebrations of death. Now check out DailyPuppy.com, where four-legged puffballs with floppy ears inspire liberal use of the exclamation point and the shorthand acronyms of English run through the texting ringer.

Here’s a sample from DailyPuppy.com, culled from the entry for Shade the baby Weimaraner: “OMG Shade you are soooooooooooo cute. Big hugs and cuddles sweetheart.” Comment boards rack up hundreds of entries, the biscuit-based voting system (which, like the amplifier on Spinal Tap, runs on a scale from one to eleven) rarely registers fewer than 10.75 biscuits per pup, and day after day, puppy after puppy, not one person has anything nasty to say about the daily doggy.

1 Comment

Filed under Culture, Opera

Let us continue the glorious march!

            Although ultimate victory against the Evil Doers is as certain today as it was when we first joined battle against this merciless and implacable foe, it is my unfortunate duty to inform you that there have been certain small and temporary setbacks in the War against Deadlines. We are not discouraged and we have already redoubled our efforts against the insolent enemy. We will pursue Overdue Assignments to the caves where they live. We will confront Due Dates on the Plains of Procrastination, and we will defeat them there. We will not weary or rest even unto the last hour of the last day of The Washington Post Sunday section production schedule. But today we must ask for patience and sacrifice on the Home Front.

             And so we offer up an Opera News cover story, recently published, on the subject of style. Herein you can find my argument that the opera house is a place of refuge for the historically endangered idea of style, the need to make distinctions, to notice detail, to honor the received wisdom of the past while we imprint our own stamp on art. I even use the word “post-modernism,” and not in a nice way.

1 Comment

Filed under Culture, Opera

Educating the privileged elite

Opera News has very kindly given web access to a story  I wrote for their July issue, in which I compare fanboy culture to opera culture:

Fanboys are not always boys, and they’re not exclusively male. They are fanatical, deeply knowledgeable about their obsessions (sci-fi, video games, anime, comics), and when they talk shop, they do not suffer fools gladly. They are the warrior-elites of what is often called “geek culture,” which is not, in the end, all that different from the culture of opera-lovers.

 And I find a few things that opera educators might envy about the more contentious, wild and vibrant world of fanboys:

 I don’t hold up fanboy culture as an ideal. But there are two valuable beliefs innate to their world that seem to have leeched out of the opera world: they equate knowledge with participation and pleasure; and they don’t expect anyone to educate them. The professional opera world often seems devoted to the very opposite of these two propositions.

This leads to a discussion of how people “self-educate,” and whether opera educators might learn from existing patterns of self-education, rather than try to institute old educational models. You can find the whole thing here.

1 Comment

Filed under Culture, Music, Opera