John Cage: Maoist Tool?

No, that’s a little harsh. But some of the most fascinating pages of Kenneth Silverman’s new biography of Cage, the pioneer of chance and indeterminacy in music, are devoted to his politics, including a passing and naive admiration for Mao. Silverman’s biography is well done, and evenhanded. The author accepts the importance of Cage’s legacy, which I dispute in a review for The New Republic’s The Book, and he doesn’t attach too much significance to the Maoist leanings. I raise the following question, more philosophical than political:

How seriously should one take his dalliance with Maoism? Silverman lays out a nuanced history of Cage’s political views, which suggests that Cage eventually realized that his admiration for Mao was inconsistent with his deeper disgust for militarism and crass political power. But it was a fascinating moment. In Chesterton’s The Napoleon of Notting Hill, a society demoralized by its political failures decides to choose its king by chance. Submitting to chance may have been, for Cage, a kind of modesty; but it was submission, nonetheless. A society that valorizes the arbitrary force of chance may well be more susceptible to submission to other forms of arbitrary power.

And I let Cage’s friend, composer Lou Harrison, bring the question back to music:

In a gentle and wise way, Cage’s friend Lou Harrison got to the essence of the problem. Harrison, a composer whose legacy is not philosophically dense as Cage’s but musically much more satisfying, once said: “I would rather chance a choice than choose a chance.” The remark has the pithiness of Cage’s best lines, and it emphasizes the degree to which Cage’s chance procedures, done with the I Ching, or later with computers, were highly constructed, deeply intentional choices. And it implicitly broaches two impolite questions: What does one risk by making artistic, aesthetic choices? And what was John Cage afraid of?


About these ads

1 Comment

Filed under Culture, Music

One response to “John Cage: Maoist Tool?

  1. Aren’t admiration of Mao and an appreciation of the I Ching kind of mutually exclusive?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s